Early Decision Data

Early Decision Data November 14, 2012 Fewer students applied Early Decision this year to Dartmouth than in the past few years. But does that indicate that the university has a weaker applicant pool than last year when they had an all-time high of applicants? No. Definitely not. Well explain why. Early Decision data is filtering in across the Ivy League for the Class of 2017. So which schools have more applicants than last year and which schools have fewer, you ask? Well, lets dig in! At Brown University, the percentage of Early Decision applicants increased by a whopping 1% this year as compared to last year. So they were pretty even on the year. The University of Pennsylvania had a 5.6% increase in Early Decision applications setting a record for the university in Philadelphia. Harvard University, Yale University, and Princeton University have Early Action programs that are non-binding (unlike Early Decision), and their data isnt in just yet. Neither is the Early Decision data for Cornell University or Columbia University. And what about Dartmouth? Well, their Early Decision data isnt as good this year as compared to the past few years. To give you some data for comparison, for the Class of 2012, 1,428 students applied. For the Class of 2013, 1,571 students submitted Early Decision applications. For the Class of 2014, 1,600 applications were received. 2015? 1,754. 2016? 1,800. But now Dartmouth has fallen from its high of 1,800 to 1,525. This thus marks the smallest Early Decision applicant pool for Dartmouth in a few years. Why do you think Penn saw an increase in Early Decision applications? And why did Dartmouth see a decrease? Does that mean that it will be easier to get into Dartmouth this year as compared to last year? Absolutely not! Just because fewer applicants apply, that doesnt mean the applicant pool is weaker. C students who apply dont make an applicant pool stronger by any means. The sheer number of applications is not the mark of a competitive applicant pool (unless the applicant pool falls to ridiculous lows). Remember, colleges even highly selective ones have a tendency to recruit students who they know cant get in just to boost their applicant pool. So this does indeed speak to a bad marketing year for the Dartmouth admissions office (at least in the Early round), but it doesnt necessarily speak to a weaker Early applicant pool. Thats an important distinction.